With the California Supreme Court decision to uphold Prop 8 the debate has been renewed. There are many arguments that have been made and will be made again. Many of these arguments are flawed. Some valid arguments are overlooked or ignored. Either side knows they are right. I have never seen a more divisive issue in my life. As such i will attempt to remain neutral in this debate (or stick to arguing the underrepresented side) as i can argue either side of this issue.
There is more to this argument than religion vs rights. First i argue against marriage as a right. Marriage is treated as and should be treated as a privilege. I feel it needs not be a right for anyone. This would eliminate most of the debate. Government supporting a law for or against same sex marriage are telling someone their church is wrong. There are churches on both sides of the debate so someone is "wrong".
Next is the financial impact. Being for or against this issue has financial impact on your business. Business on both sides of the arguments have had individuals stop doing business with them based on this issue. Some business owners are more concerned with their higher costs of benefits for a same-sex family that they do not currently provide.
More legally required benefits means more costs to businesses. This might mean lower wages for all including those who do not support same sex marriage. It could also translate into higher costs for products and services. Based on supply-demand economics, everyone will pay more for these government protections. Avoiding this company or that does not solve this. You have to avoid an entire product or service to avoid the support of the supply-demand equation.
As for Nature vs Nurture. Individuals might be born with sexual tendencies but science has yet to show a lack of choice in this debate. People are also born with tendencies toward alcoholism or violence. This part of the debate comes out as “this is a choice” vs “born this way”. You can argue either side of this debate all you want. Science can not prove choice nor can it eliminate choice. If choice is involved then this is not a right. If choice is not involved then this is not a right.
This is not a debate i can avoid. Every time i point out the flaws in a same sex marriage argument i get accused of being a bigot. If i point out the flaws in the traditional marriage argument i get accused of being immoral. The problem with the debate is it is the wrong debate to have. The California Supreme Court did what they should have done in upholding this measure. But it is still the wrong argument so it does not matter.
This being a “faith” blog i will also point out the argument of immorality vs God loves everyone. This argument is often skewed to the side of the one making it as well. God loves you no matter the side of the argument you are on. Based on the teachings of Jesus and Buddha you are to love the sinner and not the sin. Too many people forget this as they condemn homosexuals not homosexuality. To many people forget this as they condemn the homosexual haters and not hate.
If you care about what side of prop 8 i am on – you are still having the wrong argument.